Evirius Ndruru


This paper was made to reveal how ecolinguistic theory approach views Omo Hada 'Traditional House' of Nias society on the level of linguistic items interrelation to the human environment. This study was conducted using qualitative research design. Data in the form of lexicons concerning the traditional house were collected through interviewing with two seniors of Nias indigenous soceity (each aged 50 and 57 years) through electronic media (Whatsapp application). Data were analyzed by three stages, namely condensation, display, veryfying and drawing conclusion (Miles, Huberman, and Saldana, 2014). The results show there are 38 lexicons. Some of the lexicons are basic and other are derivatives. The entire lexicon is categorized as abiotic. This is because all parts of the traditional house are inanimate objects. The close relationship between Nias environment and the traditional house is reflected in the biological dimension of symbols in carving in traditional houses; social dimension praxis seen from lies in the use of lexicons giving each of the parts and materials concepts of linguistic. In addition, hunting and fighting habits ofthe society Nias with the concept of cooperation also reflects an ideology of power and that for a certain objective establishing other persons are necessary.


Lexicon, Omo Hada, Nias Island, Ecolinguistics

Full Text:



Alexander, Richard, and Arran Stibbe. 2013. “From the Analysis of Ecological Discourse to the Ecological Analysis of Discourse.” LANGUAGE SCIENCES: 1–7.

Brown, Lea. 2001. “A Grammar of Nias Selatan.”

Busser, Rik De & LaPolla, Randy J. LaPolla. 2015. Language Structure and Environment: Social, Cultural, and Natural Factors. 6th ed. ed. Farzad Sharifia And;, Ning Yu. USA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Crysmann, Berthold. 2009. “Deriving Superficial Ergativity in Nias.” Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar: 68–88.

Edney, Sue. 2016. “Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live , by Arran Stibbe, Abingdon and New York, Routledge, 2015, Vii + 210 Pp., £29.99 (Paperback), ISBN 978-0-415-83783-5.” Green Letters 20(2): 225–26.

Feng, Ran-ran, and An-hui Fan. 2012. “A Brief Analysis on the Lettered Words in Chinese--From the Perspective of Ecolinguistics.” IERI Procedia 2: 194–99.

Fill, Alwi & Mühlhäusler, Peter. 2001. The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language: Language, Ecology and Environment. 1st ed. New York: British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A.

Fill & Muhlhausler, Peter. 2004. “The Ecolinguistic Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment.” Language & Communication 24: 183–205. www.elsevier. com/locate/langcom.

Garner, Mark. 2014. “Language Rules and Language Ecology.” Language Sciences 41: 111–21.

Gulo, Ingatan. 2014. “Unique Characteristics of Nias Language.” International Journal of English and Education 3(3): 1–8.

Gulö, Ingatan. 2014. “Nias Unmutated Personal Pronouns.” IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Ver. IV 19(1): 129–34.

———. 2016. “Linguistic Analysis on The Names of Nias Ancestors.” Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya: 111–15.

Halawa, T., Harefa, A., Silitonga M. 1983. Struktur Bahasa Nias Struktur Bahasa Nias. ed. Halim Amran. Jakarta Timur: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa.

Hollandais, Les et al. 1920. “L ’ Île de Nias Au Large de Sumatra : Rites et Mégalithes.”

Kravchenko, A V. 2016. “Two Views on Language Ecology and Ecolinguistics.” Language & Communication 54: 102–13. langsci.2015.12.002.

LeVasseur, Todd. 2015. “Defining ‘Ecolinguistics?’: Challenging Emic Issues in an Evolving Environmental Discipline.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 5(1): 21–28.

Lier, Leo Van. 2010. “Social and The Ecology of Language Learning : Practice to Theory , Theory to Practice.” 3(1): 2–6.

Maru’ao, Nursayani. 2012. “A Contrastive Analysis between English and Nias Language Suffixes: Laporan Penelitian.” : 1–132.

Mavisakalyan, Astghik, Yashar Tarverdi, and Clas Weber. 2018. “Talking in the Present, Caring for the Future: Language and Environment.” Journal of Comparative Economics 2018: 36.

Miles, Mathew, Micheal Huberman, and Johnny Saldana. 2014. 1 European Journal of Science Education Qualitative Data Analysis.

Mufewe, Slioko S. 2004. The Ecology of Language Evolution: Cambridge Approaches to Language Contact. 1st ed. ed. Michael Silverstein Robert Chaudenson, Braj Kachru, Lesley Milroy, Shana Poplack. USA: Cambridge University Press.

Mühlhäusler, P. 2006. “Environment and Language.” Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics: 203–7.

Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1996. Linguistic Ecology: Language Change and Linguistic Imperialism Imperialism in the Pacific Region. 1st ed. ed. Peter Mühlhäusler. USA: Routledge.

Ndruru, M. 2017. “Metaphorical Lexicon In Maena Lyrics of Wedding in Nias: Ecolinguistic Study.” RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa 3(2): 281–89.

Polili, Andi W, Prof Tengku S Sinar, Dwi Widayati, and Abdurrahman A Syahputra. 2018. “The Status of Nias Language.” 7(1): 8–22.

Poole, Robert. 2017. “Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live by.” Critical Discourse Studies 14(5): 571–74. full/10.1080/17405904.2017.1299018.

Sianipar, Corinthias Pamatang Morgana, and Kitri Widaretna. 2012. “NGO as Triple-Helix Axis: Some Lessons from Nias Community Empowerment on Cocoa Production.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 52: 197–206.

Stibbe, Arran. 2015. Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. New York: Routledge.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.